Satellite_Aerosol_Algorithms
Deriving aerosol properties (aerosol size and optical
depth) from satellite requires that one know the aerosol type
which is present. This is due to the changes in scattering
and absorption properties for different aerosol types. When the
particles are smaller than the observing wavelength then the aerosols
scatter light in all directions. When the aerosols are relatively large
compared to the observing wavelength then more light is scattered in
the forward direction. The aerosol phase function describes how light
is scattered at different angles and we have used a polar nephelometer
to measure this aerosol property. Typically a limited set (10-20) of
aerosol types (size and composition) are assumed and satellite measured
radiances at several wavelengths are used to select the best aerosol
type for each case. This typically involves the use of a "black box"
lookup table approach but other pseudo-linearized approaches have been
used as well (Porter, PhD, 1993). These remote sensing approaches
depend heavily on having realistic aerosol models. For out work we have
used the aerosol models of Porter and Clarke (1997) which we believe
are fairly realistic in terms of their size distribution.
In addition to aerosol uncertainties, the retrieval of accurate aerosol
properties depends on correct calculation of the surface reflection.
Over the ocean (away from sun glint) this requires accurate wind
estimates. Over the open ocean large scale wind field weather models
provide an accurate estimate of the wind speed and direction. Near
coastal regions, large scale wind fields are not accurate and smaller
meso-scale models are required. The figure below shows a MODIS image
(at 250m resolution) which we have processed to obtain aerosol optical
depths. For these calculations we have used meso-scale wind fields from
various models. Although further tests are certainly needed, our
initial tests suggest the meso-scale models are not sufficiently
accurate near Hawaii. Based on varoius reasons (not discussed here), we
believe the meso-scale wind models are not sufficiently accurate due to
poor model initialization. We are now collaborating with various
investigators to implement a novel approach to obtain improved wind
fields which can be incorporated into better initialize the wind
models.