I keep going the analysis started in this note.
Figure 1: Histogram of the depth anomalies of σ = 24.4 kg/m3 in (a) WHOTS and (b) HYCOM at WHOTS location.
Figure 2: SSH STD: (a) from AVISO over the full WHOTS period, (b) from AVISO over the HYCOM period and (c) from HYCOM over the HYCOM period.
Figure 3: SSH at WHOTS location in HYCOM: (a) full and (b) AVISO-like component. The AVISO-like SSH is the 7-day averaged SSH high-pass filtered to leave only scales larger than 2°.
This is consistent with Fig. 5 of this note that shows that the overall shallowing of the isopycnal is associated with a mesoscale SSH anomaly. That is mainly the peak in SSH seen in Spring 2010 in Fig. 3. It is only the submesoscale structure where the isopycnal surface outcrops that does not have an equivalent submesoscale structure in SSH. The questions is then why in Spring 2009 in WHOTS data, the AVISO SSH does not capture the shallowing of the isopycnal surface?
Plotted thanks to the script full_WHOTS_sig_analysis_1.m in RESEARCH/PROJECTS/MARINE_BIOLOGY/SUBMESOSCALE_PROCESSES/WHOTS/analysis on the main disk.