Pacific ENSO Update2nd Quarter, 2005 Vol. 11 No. 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NEW - Experimental Sea level Forecasts
|
Tide Gauge Station | Jan | Feb | Mar |
Marianas, Guam | n/a (10) | -2.6 (10) | +11.8 (9) |
Saipan, CNMI | -11.4 (8) | -9.1 (8) | n/a (8) |
Malakal, R. Palau | -9.4 (12) | -12.6 (13) | -4.4 (11) |
Yap, FSM | -14.7 (10) | -17.4 (10) | -11.9 (10) |
Pohnpei, FSM | +4.6 (11) | +3.4 (8) | +5.8( 6) |
Kapingamar, FSM | +12.8 (9) | +6.3 (10) | +3.1 (9) |
Majuro, Marshalls | +5.2 (9) | +6.0 (6) | +7.2 (4) |
Kwajalein, Marshalls | 0 (7) | +1.9 (6) | +3.2 (5) |
Pago-Pago, A Samoa | +6.4 (5) | +5.7 (7) | -9.6 (9) |
Note: - indicate negative deviations (fall of sea-level from the mean), and + indicate positive deviations (rise of sea-level from the mean), n/a: data not available, Figures in parenthesis are year-to-year SD (standard deviations) for the month. |
With the exception of Guam in March (which had a sharp rise), a negative deviation was recorded in most of the northwestern Pacific Islands (i.e., Saipan, Malakal, and Yap) from January to March, 2005. In contrast, the low latitude Pacific Islands (i.e., Pohnpei, Kapingamarangi) and the central Pacific islands (i.e., Majuro and Kwajalein) had a positive deviation during the same time period. The sea level of the lone south Pacific station, American Samoa (Pago-Pago) displayed a slightly positive deviation in Jan and Feb; however, in March, a sharp drop is observed (Table 4). Consistent to the monthly sea level variations, the seasonal average sea level deviation of January-February-March (JFM) also displayed similar variations (Fig. 3).
This quarter (JFM) had more significant variations than the last quarter (October-November-December) of 2004. During October November December (OND) 2005, the average sea-level deviations in most of the tide gauge stations remained close to normal. In contrast during JFM 2005, a negative deviation (lower than long term average sea level) was observed in the northwest Pacific while a positive deviation (higher than long term average sea level) was observed in the region of central to southern Pacific.
Seasonal Sea Level Forecast for AMJ, MJJ, and JJA, 2005
Forecasts of the sea level deviations in the USAPI are presented here using CCA statistical model. Based on independent SST values in JFM 2005, the CCA model was used to forecast the sea level for a moving-average season of three consecutive months: April-May-June (AMJ), May-June-July (MJJ), and June-July-August (JJA) (Table 5). 1-season ahead of CCA cross-validation forecast skills (cross-validation is conducted to evaluate the overall forecasting skill of the CCA model) are also presented (Fig. 4). A short summary of forecast quality is presented (Table 5).The deviations of sea level are relatively small at the present time, but are consistent with a weak El Niño pattern that is gradually weakening. As the El Niño condition is gradually weakening, the sea level variation may not display any significant variations during the 2nd quarter of 2005.
Table 5 : Forecasts of sea level deviation in cm (AMJ: April-May-June, MJJ: May-June-July, and JJA: June-July-August)
Tide Gauge Station | AMJ | MJJ | JJA | *Forcst. quality | * Forecast quality is a measure of the expected CCA cross-validation skill. In general terms, these kinds of forecasts are thought to be of useful skill (or at least fair skill) if the CCA cross-validation value is greater than 0.3 (Fig.4). Higher skills correspond to greater expected accuracy of the forecasts. Skill levels greater than 0.5 are thought to be good, while skill levels greater than 0.6 are thought to be high. |
Guam | +5 | +5 | +6 | High | |
Saipan | * | * | +4 | Fair | |
Malakal | -4 | * | * | High | |
Yap | -3 | * | * | High | |
Pohnpei | +5 | * | * | High | |
Kapingamari | * | * | * | High | |
Majuro | +3 | * | * | High | |
Kwajalein | +6 | +5 | +3 | Good | |
Pago Pago | * | * | 3 | High | |
Note: For +/-, see notes in Table 4. Any deviations between (0~ ±2) cm is considered as negligible and denoted by * |